Uncle Bob on XML
I’m trying to catch up to my overflowing Google reader, and have just seen Uncle Bob’s posting on XML “The Hidiocy of XML Languages“:
Look, writing in XML is hideous. It’s wordy, it’s error-prone, it’s arcane, it’s redundant, it’s redundant, it’s redundant, it’s… HIDEOUS! To make matters worse, we have been embedding OTHER languages INSIDE this horrible container. EGAD! YIKES! ZOUNDS! FORSOOTH! This is just plain nuts, stupid, idiotic, retarded, poo-poo-headed, silliness!
All I can say is AMEN!!! And it just gets better.
I’ve never been a fan of XML. Yes, it does have benefits as a data transfer mechanism, though even that is questionable. Take the ACORD standards as an example. This is the standard schema for defining interoperability standards for Insurance Company operations/transactions (Quotes, etc). Fair enough, this can be very useful for companies to work together. However, each insurance company has it’s own way of doing business, and may not use the schema in the same way. ie a Policy for this company (or even Line of Business) may not mean the same as for another. So, how interoperable is that?
XML sucks. Its better than binary, or — shudder — ASN.1, but it still sucks, and should not be used as a language. Thank you Uncle Bob for your rant! It makes me that maybe, just maybe, I’m not as insane as people think when I tell them that I hate writing logic in XML.